So here's where we are. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump demanded they reopen it. Iran said no. And Trump's response? He's going to close it himself.
Let that sink in for a second.
Trump is so furious that Iran won't let ships through the Strait that his solution is... to not let ships through the Strait. It's the foreign policy equivalent of storming off the basketball court because you're losing and taking the ball home — except the ball is twenty percent of the world's oil supply.
Here's the backstory. Iran has been charging ships to pass through the Strait — reportedly up to two million dollars, payable in yuan or crypto, according to multiple reports. The UN maritime chief called it illegal. Most of the world agreed. Trump called it extortion. All fair points. But rather than build a coalition to pressure Iran diplomatically, Trump announced a U.S. naval operation to "clear out" the Strait. No ships in. No ships out. Problem solved, right?
Wrong. Because now we're the ones choking off twenty percent of global oil trade. The U.S. just made itself responsible for a global supply shock that will drive inflation worldwide and hammer every economy on the planet — allies and adversaries alike. This problem didn't exist two months ago. Trump started a war with Iran, and now here we are.
Which brings up a fair question: who exactly is running this diplomacy?
Senator Mark Kelly — retired NASA astronaut, combat veteran, not a man given to cheap shots — put it plainly at the National Action Network Convention last Saturday: "You can't send the two real estate developers to negotiate a peace with another region." He was talking about Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, two of the men Trump has entrusted with U.S. diplomacy across the Middle East, Russia, and Ukraine.
Witkoff is a sixty-nine-year-old New York and Miami real estate developer and founder of the Witkoff Group. Before Trump tapped him as special envoy, he was known for acquiring hotels and Manhattan office buildings. Kushner is Trump's son-in-law and former CEO of Kushner Companies, a family real estate firm out of New Jersey. Neither man has a background in nuclear policy, international law, or regional geopolitics. And yet there they were in Islamabad last weekend, part of a U.S. delegation led by Vice President JD Vance, for what multiple news outlets described as the first face-to-face U.S.-Iran talks since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. The talks collapsed after twenty-one hours without a deal.
Meanwhile, the region is expanding in all the wrong directions.
Israel, emboldened by U.S. support in striking Iran, has taken the opportunity to go after Lebanon as well. They're calling it counter-terrorism. But observers on the ground describe strikes in densely populated civilian areas with no obvious military targets — a pattern that looks uncomfortably familiar after Gaza. Turkey has had enough. Ankara has condemned the attacks in the strongest possible terms, calling them part of what it describes as genocidal and collective punishment policies.
Here's where it gets genuinely dangerous. Turkey fields one of the larger militaries in the region — estimates of active personnel range from roughly 350,000 to over 480,000 depending on the source, compared to Israel's approximately 170,000 active duty forces. Israel has the technological edge, some of the most sophisticated air power and intelligence capabilities in the world. But Turkey is no pushover — it's a battle-tested NATO force. If Turkey moves, Israel isn't facing a one-sided fight.
And then comes the NATO problem. Turkey is a full NATO member. Article Five says an attack on one member is an attack on all. If Israel strikes Turkey and the U.S. doesn't back its NATO ally, the alliance cracks — possibly fatally, at exactly the moment Russia is watching for weakness. And if China decides to push a tanker through our Hormuz blockade? What then? Do we stop it? Board it? Sink it?
That's how World War Three starts, folks. Not with a grand declaration. With a series of bad decisions made by people who were more comfortable doing due diligence on a hotel acquisition than navigating the fault lines of the Middle East.
From where I sit in the cheap seats, none of this had to happen. But here we are.
Join the conversation
You don't have to agree with me. You just have to be civil. I read everything.